Monday, September 19, 2011

The Secret of Mother Gothel

I saw Tangled, Walt Disney's retelling of the fairy tale of Rapunzel, at the Movies when it first came out here in NZ and last week I watched it again on DVD with Karate Lamb Chops. And I saw something interesting:


The above is a screenshot of Old Mother Gothel glaring as she steals baby Rapunzel from the castle. Does she remind you of someone from the past?




And here is 3D-ish  picture of Snow-White's stepmother with her old apple. Creepy.


Here are pictures of them in their youthful forms:

You can't tell much but I think they look kind of similar. Their personalities are pretty similar too: Vain, evil, vain, selfish. Did I mention vain?

We know about how Snow-White's stepmother wanted her stepdaughter killed so she could be the fairest in the land. And Mother Gothel?

Checking herself out in front of the mirror
Her vanity is pretty much the driving force of the film.

My contention is that Queen Grimhilde and Mother Gothel are the same people. You remember how the Queen changed herself into an ugly old hag to give Snow-White the poisonous apple? I believe that after getting chased by the Seven Dwarves and falling off the cliff, the old hag survived. She just broke off a part of her banana-shaped nose and wandered around lost and injured for a while. By the time she found her way back to the palace, Snow-White and Prince Gorgeous were living happily ever after. With the help of the dwarves, the new queen, Snow-White had found and sealed the witch's secret laboratory. So there was no way for the old hag to get back into the palace and change herself back.

So for years she wandered around the towns and villages, mortified by her ugliness. Then one day she found the magic flower from the sun that we see in the opening of Tangled. Because of her background in witchery, she knew the incantation that would work on the flower and restored her former looks again. So most days she would party around the towns and villages looking young and beautiful, coming back to the flower every now and then for a dose of its magic. This time round, though, she wasn't so much interested in being the most beautiful. Her time was now invested in retaining her youth and beauty. 

And centuries passed and the flower was taken to heal the queen of the land who was ill. Then came the birth of the cute little princess with the long golden hair. Gothel stole the baby, raised it in a tower and we know the rest. By 'we', I mean those of us who have seen the movie since Disney's version differs drastically from the fairy tale.

About the link between Mother Gothel and Queen Grimhilde, Walt Disney would probably deny it, but what do they know? Or there is a conspiracy going on. Like all the Disney villains are still alive and hiding somewhere. Probably in a secret bunker underground with Hitler. Maybe we'll soon see a villain who looks eerily like Gaston. Somebody alert the President!

Fine, I made the whole thing up. But it works, don't you think?

Anyway, if you haven't seen Tangled yet, I'd totally recommend it. It is just awesomebulous!

Wednesday, September 14, 2011

Contradictions, Consequences, Blunder and Bible

In the Youth Fellowship of the NZTCF (New Zealand Tamil Christian Fellowship), we're studying about the Bible. My group had to give a presentation about Inerrancy of the Bible as if we are addressing a professing Christian who thinks that the Bible, though inspired by God, has a lot of errors. I had to do a bit about contradictions in the Bible, textual variations and spiritual consequences. So I'm putting up my part of the presentation here, though I've had to tidy it up a bit.



In its own context, the Bible doesn't have contradictions. But the context is very important. If one is unaware of the context of the words, then there will be a lot of confusion.

Now Romans 14:21 says, "It is good not to eat meat or drink wine or do anything that causes your brother to stumble."

Taking the verse at face value, you might ask. Is it bad to eat meat? Does eating meat make people stumble? Didn't Jesus eat meat? Didn't God provide meat in the wilderness for His people in the Old Testament. There seems to be a contradiction. (I’m leaving out the wine part >_< )

But if you read the whole of Romans 14, you will see that the Apostle Paul is talking about weaker believers who religiously practice certain conventions which, while aren't necessarily wrong, aren't Biblical either. We see an example of a Christian who firmly believes that it is sinful to eat meat. Paul is telling the other believers not be cruel and pick fights with this Christian for his convictions. It is as if he is saying, "So when you're with this guy, it would be great if you could just eat vegetarian like he does, so you don't hurt your Christian brother's feelings over a small matter and cause him to stumble in his Christian walk with God."


Or take this example:

John 20:1 says, “Now on the first day of the week Mary Magdalene came to the tomb early, while it was still dark, and saw that the stone had been taken away from the tomb.”(ESV)

Now according to this verse, who went to the tomb early in the morning? Mary Magdalene.

And in this verse, who else is mentioned as being with her? No one.

Mark 16:1, 2 says, “When the Sabbath was past, Mary Magdalene, Mary the mother of James, and Salome bought spices, so that they might go and anoint him. And very early on the first day of the week, when the sun had risen, they went to the tomb.”(ESV)

Now according to this verse, who went to the tomb early in the morning? Mary Magdalene, Mary the mother of James, and Salome.

Is someone lying? Did John make a mistake? Why didn't he mention the other women? Does this mean the entire account of the Resurrection Morning is wrong and false. Yes, at face value there is a contradiction.

But remember to look at the context! If you continued reading John 20 you will notice the second verse which says this, “So she ran and went to Simon Peter and the other disciple, the one whom Jesus loved, and said to them, “They have taken the Lord out of the tomb, and we do not know where they have laid him.
(John 20:2 ESV)

Notice that she says "WE do not know where they have laid him."

Which clearly indicates that John knew that there had been at least one person with her, though he doesn‘t mention their presence. In all honesty, when comparing with Matthew’s account and Luke’s account we can conclude that there were at the least four other women who had gone to the tomb with Mary Magdalene. I don’t know why John didn’t mention them but I have an idea.

Do you remember what happened to Mary Magdalene later as mentioned in John 20? After meeting Peter and John, she went down to the garden near Jesus’ tomb to cry because she thought Jesus’ body had been stolen. There she met a Man Whom she mistook for the gardener. She implored Him to tell her what had happened to Jesus’ body. The Man said one word, “Mary” and she immediately recognised Him as Jesus except He was not dead but alive with a perfectly new body. (Personally, I love the fact that Jesus first appeared to Mary Magdalene, a woman, and not to the men, His disciples.)

I think that, because he wanted to focus on Mary Magdalene’s experience of meeting the Resurrected Lord in the garden, John didn’t bother to mention the other ladies’ names. So no real contradiction here.

Of course there are certain ways that the Bible is not completely perfect. But that has everything to with us humans and nothing to do with God. Some of the apostles who wrote the books of the bible, didn't go to great universities and likely made grammatical errors. But these don’t affect the truth of what they are saying.  For example, if one of those Indian Immigrants suddenly came up to you on top of One tree Hill and said in a strong accent, "Take photo me please", his bad grammar doesn't change the fact that he wants you to take his picture.

And there is the thing called copyist error. When the Bible was written there were no printers and the Bible had to be copied down very very very carefully by scribes. Now rarely, but once in a while, the scribe would make a small mistake and subsequent copies of that particular copy may carry that same mistake. Now we don't have the original manuscripts that the prophets and the apostles wrote on but what we do know is that there are many thousands of old manuscripts of the Bible today. And comparing them together, our Bible publishers give us the most accurate version possible in our hands. And we have to believe and trust that God will never let his truth fade away.

Is the belief of Biblical inerrancy necessary for salvation? Just because someone doesn’t believe in Inerrancy, does it mean that they are unsaved? No, there are many good loving Christians who do not believe in inerrancy. And there are people who believe in inerrancy but continue to deny God's truth with their lives.

Belief in the inerrancy of the bible is not necessary for salvation. The only thing necessary is repentance and believing that Jesus has died for our sins. But all the same, not believing that God's Word is perfectly true will lead to problems. There will be questions of what part of the bible is true and which is false. You will be picking and choosing verses that suit your moods and personal worldview which will not give you the complete picture of what God is telling us. Believing that the Bible has mistakes will make you question whether God really is perfect and all knowing and all powerful.

When you encounter spiritual warfare, with accusations and deceptions from the sinful world, according to Ephesians 6, you need to wear God's armour.

Therefore take up the whole armour of God, that you may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand firm. Stand therefore, having fastened on the belt of truth, and having put on the breastplate of righteousness, and, as shoes for your feet, having put on the readiness given by the gospel of peace. In all circumstances take up the shield of faith, with which you can extinguish all the flaming darts of the evil one; and take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God,
(Ephesians 6:13-17 ESV)

But how can you overcome your enemy if you can't trust your sword, the Word of God?

God created us. He knew his children even before the world began. And while great godly men were penning down the words of the Bible, inspired by the Holy Spirit, we were in the very mind of God. The very words of the Bible were written for us by our Heavenly Father. God’s word is a masterpiece of love for His children.

Wednesday, September 7, 2011

London's Burning

I know the London Riots are sad but this cartoon makes me giggle.

From www.nzherald.co.nz

Tuesday, May 3, 2011

Osama Bin Laden is dead! O_o

From www.nzherald.co.nz

Not too long ago, I had thought that the next time I blogged, it would be about the Royal Wedding. But I think I'll save that for later.

Because, you see, I watched the scene of the Twin Towers crumbling down, nearly ten years ago, on TV from our living room in our flat in Chennai, India.This past afternoon in the living room of our home in Auckland, New Zealand, I watched the news report of the death of Osama bin Laden, the man mainly responsible for 9/11 and many other acts of terrorism.

I'm not American and I can't imagine what Americans and people living in America have gone through since the 11th of September, 2001. But 9/11 changed the world for everyone, including me. There has been so much fear, war and death in the last ten years because of what happened that day. The threat of Al-Qaeda has been looming in the back of every one's mind like an unseeable but omnipresent monster. But now that the bogeyman is dead, there is some closure and peace seems almost attainable again.

The loss of human life is tragic, even Bin Laden's. He was someones father, someone brother. I'm sure that there were some people in his estranged family who, though they disowned him and hated his ideology, loved him and are grieving for him.

But I can't help but feel happy about his death. In fact, I'm shocked at the people criticising the US government for killing Bin Laden without a trial. There are even people who are criticising our NZ PM, John Key and the leader of the opposition, Phil Goff, for being happy about Bin Laden's death on the basis of not believing in the Death Penalty. For those people I'll just quote Harper Lee.

"Mr Finch, there's just some kind of men you have to shoot before you can say hidy to 'em. Even then, they ain't worth the bullet it takes to shoot 'em."


How many people have a problem with Boo Radley killing Bob Ewell? 

I believe in second chances. I believe that when someone goes wrong you try your best to reform and change them. But then there comes a time when nothing can be done and you have to consider the safety of others.

Anyone remember Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh? He was this nice terrorist man who kidnapped three Britons and an American in New Delhi back in 1994 and threatened to behead them if the Indian Government didn't release his little terrorist friends. Sheikh was arrested and incarcerated in an Indian prison.

Then on December 1999, a bunch of his friends hijacked Indian Airlines Flight 814 and demanded his release in exchange for the lives of the hundred ninety-three passengers and crew members on board. Sheikh was freed but, sadly, by then it was too late for one of the passengers. A 25 year old male on his honeymoon had been stabbed multiple times and later succumbed to his injuries. My cousins and I watched the story unfold in the news in Madurai at my uncle's house. It almost ruined the Christmas break for us.

Sheikh went on to kidnap American Journalist, Daniel Pearl. People all over the world watched and waited, hoping and praying for Pearl's release. I was one among those people, watching the news anxiously. We all know how that sad story ended.

Shiekh was again arrested and is currently awaiting his execution in a Pakistani prison. Even while incarcerated he's caused a lot of trouble. According to the Pakistani newspaper, Dawn, in 2008, he prank-called the President of Pakistan, pretending to be India's Foreign Minister Pranab Mukherjee and almost caused a major war. True story. Only he didn't mean it as a friendly April Fool's joke.

What I'm trying to say is that the US Forces killing Osama bin Laden without trial might have been the safest thing to do. I only hope that he's really dead; to be honest, the buried-at-sea story is a bit too wonky for me.


On a lighter note, NZ Herald has put up some tweets relating to the incident. Here are some of my favourites:


"Wow Osama Bin Laden is dead. Cause of death? Dunno...but I am secretly hoping a giant plane flew into him"

"He never should've facebooked those photos from easter weekend."

"Saddam? Check. Osama? Check. I bet Gaddafi will be making sure the chain is on the door tonight."

"Britain is all happy and celebratory and now the US - it's kind of like a street party..but...bigger. :-)"

"Now that everyone thinks I'm dead, I can go wherever I want! Anyone know if those Lord of the Rings sets are still up in New Zealand?"

"Am I the only one hearing "Ding Dong the Witch is Dead" playing in my head right now?"

""I have never wished a man dead, but I have read some obituaries with great pleasure." - Mark Twain"

"A prince gets married, the bad guy is dead. It's a real Disney weekend here on earth."

"Well they do say weddings and funerals often go together."

".... And that's how the USA out-does the royal wedding"

"That awkward moment when you get Osama and Obama mixed up"

"FOR SALE- 1 Turban,1pair of birkenstock sandals (brown) AK 47 assault rifle and Braun beard trimmer(never used)."

"Not sure how I feel about Twitter being only about a historical day in history. Does no one care about the leftover pizza I'm about to eat?"

"So who actually found Osama bin Laden? Was it the CIA -- or Google Street View?"

"Osama Bin Nada."

"1st of May US time bin laden announced dead, 1st of May 1945 Hitler announced dead. Conspiracy theorists assemble!"

"Oh great, the 9/11 conspiracy theorists are back. Wonderful."

"Hey usa its not all of you, remember australia, NZ and britan helping you on this war. We are not just the outsiders."

"Don't wanna be the Grinch about Osama -- but when Col Sanders died, KFC didn't disappear."

"R.I.P Osama Bin Laden - World Hide And Go Seek Champion (2001 - 2011)"

"With the huge crowd gathered outside the White House, Barack and Michelle should kiss on the balcony."

"Good-night. Sleep peacefully everyone. America Got 99 problems but Osama ain't one."



Monday, April 18, 2011

Darjeeling Tea

I like Tea. I don’t love it but I do like it. I like the little ceramic cups  and the teapot  they serve you in Asian restaurants before your meal. I like a cup of hot green tea with my mother after a heavy meal. I just have to have a cup of tea after my Sunday Nana nap, just before evening church service just so I can fresh up for the sermon.

But really, I’m not much of a tea drinker. In fact, there was a time, I really disliked tea, despite the fact that my Mum could conjure up some mean Chai. I didn’t like the taste; I didn’t like the brown colour; I didn’t like the black wet powdery residue it left on the insides of the cup or on your tongue or in the tea strainer.

But that was before my first cup of Darjeeling tea. I guess you’ll have to need a really really good cuppa before you start appreciating tea in general. So here’s the story behind my first good cup of tea.

It was the month of June, 2005, a few months before we left India for New Zealand. We knew those months were to be our last few months in our home-country and we wanted to make the most of it. Now my family and the family of my uncle (my father’s brother) had often talked about making a trip to North India together. We’d spent nearly all our lives in the warm South Indian Plateau and wanted to see something new. We decided that it was finally time for these plans to come to fruition.

But India is a vast huge place, where do we go? Should we see Delhi, in the heart of the country and Agra the location of the Taj Mahal? Or should we see the Thar Desert in Rajasthan. Or should we go to Shimla and get our first glimpse of snow.

Finally we hit upon a plan that everybody liked: We’ll go to the North East of India. We’ll take a train till the New Jalpaiguri Railway Station and immediately take the four-plus hour car trip to Gangtok in the little state of Sikkim. Then we’ll visit the beautiful Himalayan town of Darjeeling and see the tea gardens and the rare view of Mount Kanchenjunga. Then, finally, we’ll take a small pit stop at Kolkata, where my mother had spent her childhood, before returning home to Chennai.

This plan was especially charming to me: I had just finished my important Tenth Standard exams and part of my English syllabus was this beautiful travelogue about Darjeeling by Indian writer R.K Narayan. After reading that lovely piece of writing, I had longed to experience Darjeeling for myself. The enthusiasm was shared by the whole family with the exception of my boy cousin who had studied the same piece of writing at school but hadn’t appreciated it due to a serious lack of imagination(:P).

June came and our trip began. Mum took out all the woollies which we’ve had for years but never really needed before. My uncle’s family arrived at our place from their home city, Madurai. They spent the night with us at our house. The next day we loaded our luggage into two taxis and headed to Chennai’s Central Station. Once there, the nine of us, Uncle, Aunty, Dad, Mum, Older Girl-cousin, Me, Boy-cousin, Little Brother, Little sister (in age order, in case you didn’t guess) boarded the train to New Jalpaiguri.
Two weeks of baggage


We had a wonderful two day train ride in our cosy Air Conditioned compartment simply spending time with each other. We ate our own delicious home-cooked food (cooked by my Aunty) part of the way and ordered train food for the rest.



Boy-cousin educating himself on current events


We read Readers Digests and fought for the window seat.




While the train was static we enjoyed the sights, sounds and smells (at least the good smells) of the railway station. While the train was in motion, we enjoyed the moving countryside, the paddyfields, people in the rural towns, cars on bridges, crowded roads, the bright lights of the city at night and the lone light bulb shining through the window of some unseeable house in the dark nothingness. People, if you’ve never been to India before and get a chance to make the journey, please, please make sure you take at least one overnight train trip. It’s the ultimate Indian experience. 

Then some 40 hours after we started, we reached our stop at the New Jalpaiguri station, It was around 1:00 AM in the morning…or night whichever way you want to look at it. It looked like night to us, anyhow. There is the panic and urgency adults may feel when they’re in an unknown place and need to transport five adolescents and two weeks of clothes and necessities out of a train and on to the platform. Once that had been overcome, and the train had left, the natural question was, “What do we do next?” It was too dark to attempt the mountainous car trip to Gangtok and so the logical thing to do would be to find a taxi to convey us to a hotel to spend the night. But, you know, things don’t usually go as planned. Not in my family anyway.

After a conversation with the railway station people, in which Mum who knew a bit of Hindi played translator, we discovered that we were stuck where we were. No taxi would be taking us anywhere until the sun is out and about. This was not good news. We were tired, we were cold; and we needed our beauty sleep.

So we laid down our luggage and spread some newspapers on the floor. Those who were tired enough could sleep on them. This was not very appealing to us. There were cockroaches and rats around and who knows who’d spit on the ground or worse. And did I mention it was cold?

Just as we were settling down, the lights went off. Great. We were left in the dark. The cold dark.


I thought it couldn’t get any worse. Stupid me.

Girl-cousin making sure our luggage don't get wet
It began to rain. Heavy windy rainy. And part of the platform roof was broken. We had to get up and move our bags and baggage closer to the wall so they wouldn’t get wet. We were left in the dark railway station in the cold rain, with cockroaches, rats, strangers who couldn’t speak Tamil or English and that stray dog which looked like it needed a flea treatment. Add an annoyed Boy-cousin who kept staring daggers at Mum and me as if we’d conspired with nature to make his life miserable.

Brother makes the best of a bad situation

I tried to sleep on the ground but I couldn’t. I was worried. What if our trip was nothing like we thought it would be? What if all our plans go awry? What if we were angry and miserable for the rest of the two weeks. I got up from the floor and sat on a bench. The plastic seat was cold. The rain had stopped by now and it was simply quiet. I sat there feeling tired and unhappy and eventually fell asleep. After what seemed like five minutes, I awoke suddenly. I was still very very cold but the dawn was breaking. It was finally morning. Papa and Uncle were talking to some people and then came around with tea (Finally we’ve reached the main subject. The Tea).

“It’s Darjeeling Tea,” said Aunty. I've never liked tea much, but I was cold and my throat was hurting. I took the warm white disposable plastic cup in my hands. I took a sip of the drink.

Patrick Jane, in an episode of the Mentalist (Red Carpet Treatment, fourth episode of Season 3 to be exact) described Tea as ‘a hug in a cup’. That’s exactly what it felt like. The hot cup of tea, sweet and milky warmed my blood and gave strength and energy to my bones. The soreness of my throat was gone and I was awake. My blood sugar was up and I felt happy. The mood change was evident among my family. Everyone was up and ready for what the day might bring. Of course, it was just normal tea. Still the cold and tiredness had made it seem ten times better.
Drinking Tea

A sight for sore eyes
Within a couple of hours, we had hired a car, loaded our luggage and were on our way to Sikkim. In spite of our misadventure, the rest of the trip was great. Even Boy-cousin loved it. He won’t admit it, though. The adventure was everything we thought it would be. And more.
Enjoying ourselves in Darjeeling 3days later

Saturday, June 26, 2010

Marvellous Message

Last Friday was the last Friday of the month and that means Youth Group. We had our youth outing this time. We went to the Hansan Vietnamese Restaurant in Panmure next to the Ten Pin bowling place. The food was very good (and I recommend the place to anyone I know), and after we had eaten we headed to the Church building for our study. We sat in the Sunday school room/Kitchen with the little heater turned on and sang praise and worship songs. Then Pastor Orr started the study.

Pastor Orr had asked us a few weeks ago if there were any topics we'd like to discuss in Youth Group. We gave him a list and at the top of the list was "The Importance of Eschatology". We understood that there are many schools of thought regarding the end times. But are we supposed to follow one of those schools? Which school is right? Why are there so many different views? Is Eschatology, over which people have debated and disagreed, worth the fuss and bother of studying it?

In our last Youth Group meeting when Pastor Orr began our study in Eschatology, he made it very clear that it is a waste of time to fight over which Millenial view is right. But it is also very important to see what the bible says about Jesus' coming since it is a vital part of the gospel.

So this week we went through 1 Thess 4:13 - 5:11 which talks about the hope we have in Jesus' return.

One day, suddenly, Jesus will return. My Ammachi (Mum's mother) who is buried in the cemetery in Madurai and scores of other relatives and friends who have died in Christ will just wake up with glorious new bodies. And I, if I am still around at the time, will be taken up to meet Jesus in the air, with many many others. It is a wonderful thought.

And sadly I didn't feel excited about it at all.

But there was a time I used to be so excited about heaven. I remember singing the Sunday School song "The countdown's getting lower everyday" as a child. I was so excited because I understood that each day is a day closer to Jesus' return. We have this children's book called 'Let's Talk About Heaven'. When I was a youngster, I used to sit with the book on my lap, Old Yeller and The Old Hag sitting on either side of me while I made up a story for them about how we'd go to heaven. It doesn't seem that long ago when I used to look intently at the pink evening sky, marvel at the beautifully shaped clouds and say wistfully to myself, "Maybe Jesus will come on a day like this." Sometimes I'd close my eyes tightly and say to myself, "Maybe Jesus will return by the time I open my eyes." I would image my Aachi (Papa's mother) suddenly dropping her walking stick behind as she is taken up in the air, her old-woman form becoming girlish, her weak limbs strengthened, her wrinkles disappearing as she meets her Saviour in the sky.

But now I fear that if Jesus came today, I would throw up my arms and say, "Wait a minute, please. Can't you give me some more time? A few weeks? A year is even better." Because there is so much I want to see and do. I want to go on a trip to Venice, I want to get married, I want to see what happens in the next chapter of my favourite manga which is being released next week, I want to see the Tintin movie by Spielberg and Peter Jackson. If Jesus came today, I can't do any of that.

When did I become like this? Why am I like Lot's wife, who looked behind longingly at the pleasures of sin and destruction while refuge and redemption was before her. It's as ridiculous as if some of the children of Israel on reaching the promised land say to Joshua, "Aww...is it time already? But we want to wander in the wilderness a little longer."

I know in my head that Heaven will wonderful, amazing and awesome beyond imagination. I know in my head that once I reach there, I'll forget about all the pleasures of the world and will be deliriously happy. After all it wouldn't be heaven if there were sorrow, pain, and tears. But my heart doesn't fully believe or understand it.

I think our study really helped me that day. It helped me remember what the Bible says about the last resurrection. It brought back a part of the excitement I used to have. And I'm now trying to let go of the things that seem to weigh me down to earth.

Do you feel a tad apprehensive about leaving earth and going to heaven? Does the idea of Jesus' return no longer excite you? Are any of you finding that you're laying up treasures in earth and not in heaven? Isn't it time you did something about it?

Because the fact that Jesus is coming is really a marvellous message like the hymn says.

Marvelous message we bring;
Glorious carol we sing,
Wonderful word of the King:
Jesus is coming again!

Tuesday, May 25, 2010

What do you think...?

...about me changing my blog name to "Life of a (young) Old Maid" to celebrate my marriage-less state which may (I fear with increasing paranoia) turn out to be permanent.



It can't be too bad, though. I'll have two cats (a tabby named Belinda and a three-legged ginger named George), take Sunday School, write children's novels including a History Of India for kids and pretend to be the mean old crosspatch next-door and shake my cane (I mean to have one) at the neighbourhood children.

That sounds like fun, no? :)